/lit/ - Literature

>>19324776
Why the insult? I don't understand your point, anon.
And Newton was a heretic, he was literally arian and a monophysite. Don't care what someone belonging to the demonic hellfire said.

>The union between him and the Father he interprets to be like that of the saints with one another. That is in agreement of will and counsel.
Literally saying the Son is a creature.

>It was the son of God which He sent into the world and not a human soul that suffered for us. If there had been such a human soul in our Saviour, it would have been a thing of too great consequence to have been wholly omitted by the Apostles.
>There is nowhere mention of a human soul in our Saviour besides the word, by the meditation of which the word should be incarnate. But the word itself was made flesh and took upon him the form of a servant.

Literally saying Christ is not human.

>>19130035
Even a Roman Catholic should have big problems with saying that Christ didn't assume the same human nature as us. Protestants go to the other extreme and tend to make His human nature fallen.