/lit/ - Literature

>>11274013
>>11274272
>>11274282
I don't really get this. I've had the opposite experience. Kind of like pic related. /lit/ is a great example of it. No one knows what they're on about half the time, they just bullshit their way through with smug self-appraisal.

>>10858998
Not really. 'Book' isn't important, 'content' is. /lit/ generally does, however, which is why you routinely see them """"discuss"""" with arrogance and smugness, things which they know nothing of. It seems their interests and education instill a sense of empty knowing. Wherein they're basically poorly educated but pretend they are something beyond notions of educated. /lit/ can barely discuss things as they pertain to literature, let alone anything that slightly verges beyond. It is laughable, even, when there is a linguistic-related thread here. Which you would think they'd have some basic knowledge of or interest in. Yet they don't even understand what graphemes and phonemes are. They can't do anything outside of reading some pathetic formulaic fiction. Won't even consider deeper study of said fiction. /lit/ and their ilk are unbelievably ignorant, yet someone retain the popular notion that they're above the world. I think this is ultimately an issue of non-STEM """""""""people""""""", AKA pretend-educated, existing in general. Pic related.

What do you think of picrelated?