/lit/ - Literature

>>20649117
>Kant talks about this with analytic truths like a bachelor is an unmarried man. Why is a bachelor unmarried? Because a bachelor is an unmarried man.

yet I can easily empirically falsify that by hypothesis testing, can you propose a method of hypothesis testing on "is X more fit than Y"? Simple science.

>>20649124
>The sterile bees since a hive filled with non-sterile bees wouldn't function.

Im not talking about the hive, on a subgroup level or individually, who is more fit?

how aware is lit that at least evolution is unfalsifiable pseudoscience? Its entirely circular and makes nor falsifiable predicitons about the future, and not even practical usefull observations about the present like presenting a methodology of testing for vestigial human organs. Its just crappy Hegelian mental exercise with scientific lingo.

>>20618028
>the theory of evolution does not reasonably explain the massive gap in intelligence between humans and other creatures

it does, it explains EVERYTHING, there is not fact in the world that can falsify it because its entirely UNFALSIFIABLE, a catch22 of science.

>>19604051
>Daily reminder that evolution has been reproduced in laboratory both for unicellular and larger beings.

longterm e coli exp? Yeah, that ended well...they fished for posthoc hypothesis after it all turned out to be total meh.

>>19604069
>Evolution has not been reproduced. It has been somewhat controlled and observed.

they just demonstrate natural selection and then call it evolution and claim billions on years while presenting what is basically selective breeding as evidence