/lit/ - Literature

kids are so impressionable. try getting into trouble and out of it all on your own. wow, man! just wow!

>>5983053
That is pure /lit/ gold right there. Hasn't been this epic of a bread in a long long time.

I wonder how people actually read the archived thread till the end.

I don't think you guys know the caliber of genius you're up against.

I have still yet to ascertain an opponent capable of talking on the same intellectual plain as me.

What's the most nourishing book you've read?

It's rather telling that the most popular thread on /lit/ is a highschool reading thread.

This implies that either most everyone is still in highschool, and/or the only reading anyone on /lit/ has ever done has been in highschool.

Pathetic losers, all of you.

>>4655998
>>4656011
>anons have their points refuted
>no! no! no! It's just how they wrote during the time.
Wrong.

Smollett, Lewis, Mary Shelley, Fielding, and many many more wrote better prose than Austen.

Her terrible bumpy menstral blood prose can't be blamed on age.

Try again or admit defeat in our little debate.

Serious question, what's the difference between LGBT and lit, cause it looks the same to me.