[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.4586094 [View]
File: 42 KB, 625x351, 1392853222584.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4586094

The question of free will vs determinism is a question of science, not philosophy. Keep your immature shit flinging in kindergarten where it belongs.

Science has solved the problem. Free will has been proven to exist by quantum mechanics. Deal with it.

>> No.4536508 [View]
File: 42 KB, 625x351, 1391555018868.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4536508

>>4536498

>> No.4471213 [View]
File: 42 KB, 625x351, 1389754200958.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4471213

>>4471198
>THERE IS NO OBJECTIVE KNOWLEDGE AT ALL
All of science and math is objective truth.

>STRAWMAN.
You might want to look that word up in a dictionary before using it incorrectly again, you dimwitted simpleton.

>ANOTHER UNEDUCATED STRAWMAN.
A philosotard calls a scientist uneducated? My lels are in orbit.

>PRETTY MUCH EVERY SCIENTIST AND PHILOSOPHER OF SCIENCE
Appeal to authority and argumentum ad populum are fallacies.

>YOU CANNOT HAVE ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY ABOUT ANYTHING
Yes, I can. Everything in science and math is 100% true.

>> No.4420713 [View]
File: 42 KB, 625x351, 1388416900970.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4420713

>my sides when so many buttmad christfags ITT

Dawkins is the best scientist and best author of all times. His books should become mandatory reading in every high school. With sound and valid logic he scientifically proves the non-existence of sky fairies. The only people who dislike him are immature manchildren who want to believe in magic.

>> No.4178788 [View]
File: 42 KB, 625x351, do you even science le funny meme.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4178788

Science proves there is objective truth.

>> No.3998588 [View]
File: 42 KB, 625x351, do you even science le funny meme.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3998588

>>3998568
>is not demonstrable, it is conceptual, metaphysical
Observational evidence is neither conceptual nor metaphysical.

>>3998569
Do you even understand the inequation you posted? Do you realize that it has nothing to do with the statement in your post?

>> No.3533759 [View]
File: 42 KB, 625x351, do you even science le funny meme.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3533759

>>3533758
>beliefs
>objective

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]