/lit/ - Literature

>>11885592
>you seem to be using the word "game" unironically. I don't think you're in a position to criticize anyone.
Because it is a game. There are winners, losers, judges, and prizes. Just because assholes figure it out and use it to con women into sleeping with them, doesn’t change the fact that dating can, and should be, an enjoyable experience for both members, like playing a game of chess.

Think of it like you’re a salesman, the product is “you”, and the customer is “her”. Are you going to be a greasy, used-car type who suckers people into buying his crap, or are you going to invest more energy into improving your product so that you don’t need to bamboozle people to get them to bite?

>women don’t have time to play games
holy fucking shit, You don’t know jack shit about women. What women don’t have time for is your needy passive behavior where you refuse to even engage her, and just expect her to do all the hard work and show all the fucking initiative.