[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.19752967 [View]
File: 65 KB, 850x400, 64817A1C-C2DD-4009-B369-0CA27F60B006.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19752967

Books about the superiority of the medieval world to the classical one.

I don’t like the classical world just cause the modern world reminds me more of the classical world than the medieval one.
And there must be a reason why Nazis and communists both preferred neoclassical over gothic.

>> No.19749717 [View]
File: 65 KB, 850x400, 87079F1F-2A16-4F7D-8C91-F07782B22642.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19749717

>>19749689
Why do you deny the fact that Europe has been pagan since the renaissance? It’s upsetting that the renaissance destroyed an evolving medieval culture, but everyone admits it. As Oscar Wilde put it:

> To me one of the things in history the most to be regretted is that the Christ’s own renaissance, which has produced the Cathedral at Chartres, the Arthurian cycle of legends, the life of St. Francis of Assisi, the art of Giotto, and Dante’s Divine Comedy, was not allowed to develop on its own lines, but was interrupted and spoiled by the dreary classical Renaissance that gave us Petrarch, and Raphael’s frescoes and Palladian architecture, and formal French tragedy, and St. Paul’s Cathedral, and Pope’s poetry, and everything that is made from without and by dead rules, and does not spring from within through some spirit informing it.

And John Ruskin saw it the same way

> John Ruskin's strong rejection of Classical tradition in The Stones of Venice typifies the inextricable mix of aesthetics and morality in his thought: "Pagan in its origin, proud and unholy in its revival, paralysed in its old age... an architecture invented, as it seems, to make plagiarists of its architects, slaves of its workmen, and sybarites of its inhabitants; an architecture in which intellect is idle, invention impossible, but in which all luxury is gratified and all insolence fortified." Rejection of mechanisation and standardisation informed Ruskin's theories of architecture, and his emphasis on the importance of the Medieval Gothic style. To John Ruskin, neo-classical architecture expressed a morally vacuous and repressive standardisation. Ruskin associated Classical values with modern developments, in particular with the demoralising consequences of the industrial revolution, resulting in buildings such as The Crystal Palace, which he criticised.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]