/lit/ - Literature

>>17669753
Holy shit I'm not even a Evola worshipper but you are pathetic
He is wrong
Check this >>17667839

Oh and also I'm never going to take someone who doesn't understand western esotericism,jewish mysticism,hermeticism,platonism and neo-platonism/gnosticism,''hinduism'',occultism,european mithology and religion in general seriously when he talks about Evola,you absolute fucking hylics.

Considering you seem to enjoy a copypasta that uses the word ''reactionism'' I also want to remind you leftists can't possibly revolt,the technological utopia you envision will never happen either.
Authors like Ted K(as an introduction) and Jacques Ellul(harder and more detailed) come to mind.

Even at the time Ellul wrote his text,he noted that Technique had already become independent of the machine,for Technique had transcended the limits of (economic) production to encompass all activities.
Blaming Capitalism is therefore not at all sufficient,since the Machine encompasses far more than capitalism does.Technique causes everything to have to be considered in terms of the Machine.Progress is far broader than Capitalism because even its supposed antithesis Communism still fits withing this same expectation that the only ''truths'' about human society is the technical operation to make it function more efficiently as a giant social machine.
In a perverse re-deffinition of the term,growth was once instinctive but is now rational (economic growth,technical progress,social progress etc..)
Both Capitalism and Communism accept this re-deffinition and only disagree over which method will yield a better result from a strictly technical level.
Bonus points if anyone knows where I copied this from,I'm tired kek

Leftists/progressives can't ''win'',they will lead humanity into a nightmare if they continue to rule.
I'm also not an an-prim monke larper despite enjoying an-prim lit,anarchism can't work.