[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.2461396 [View]
File: 19 KB, 240x240, schopenhauer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2461396

>>2461375
>some literature is clearly good and not entertaining, and some literature clearly entertaining and not good

This doesn't seem "immediately comprehensible" in the slightest. Please give at least two examples, one of a work you think is good but not entertaining, and one of a work you think is entertaining but not good.

More to the heart of the matter, how can you measure the quality of art if not in enjoyment you personally receive from it? It's downright disingenuous to simply say "someone else's opinion is the RIGHT one, but I disagree with them."

>> No.2358089 [View]
File: 19 KB, 240x240, schopenhauer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2358089

>mfw reading Dragonlance

>> No.2333121 [View]
File: 19 KB, 240x240, schopenhauer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2333121

[spoiler]Woah woah woah woah woah

>schoppy
>boring</spoiler>

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]