/lit/ - Literature

>>16932998
i don't really read philosophy, hardly ever any non-fiction, only if the theme is interesting and the prose is good.
i'm a man of literature, mostly fine, sometimes runrefined, guilty pleasure here, thoughtful read there. i honestly read just to broaden the borders of perception and acquire enough data for the eternal self-reflective neurosimulation that awaits after death

i have read close to 250 books in the past 3 years and havent rated a single one (that i didnt drop) below 6/10, most were 7.5 and up, i only read what i like

>>16900990
navigation is okay, i love the abundance of lists to choose my next reads from, reviews i only loosely use as guidelines for most cant be trusted.

in fact i dislike overly user-friendly sites, they're usually filled with vapid retards as a result and it feels like you're on some childrens app all the time. some amount of 2010's web roughness and quaint simplicity that hasnt been updated in years makes a great site

to me, homoeroticism is one of the most aesthetic things a human can engage in, but homosex is disgusting. i'm not sexually attracted to dicks, balls and man assholes. vulgarity ruins every cute or solemn manifestation of homoerotic imagery.
some mild kissing or petting though is divine in its looks and essense. i wish there were more brolike or sophisticated homo content, be it lit or movies.