/lit/ - Literature

>>19292155
>Denying biological sex for the sake of gender expression (what the xenofeminists or transgender and non-binary crowd desire) fails on account of the fact that it ignores the innate biological advantages that the sex binary awards a population. A society that attempts to optimize for "free expression" will not be able to compete with a population that optimizes for "material advantages", and ironically, their people will not even be more content or liberated. They will not benefit from a greater sense of self-actualization or whatever else they use as the motivator for their philosophy.

>Dismissing this as simply a fantasy or a fetish will not stop it from transpiring. I am in the penultimate phase of my research. I harbor no hatred for non-binary people or transgender people, but evolution will not stop for the sake of gender abolitionist philosophy.

This was all much more eloquently described in The Catcher in the Rye