[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.14301811 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, 9caa4257-1f93-4160-a944-74e33722f2a4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14301811

>Economics
There is your problem. Neoliberal economics is peddled in most of those departments. Read theory and rise above, anon.

>> No.14301575 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, 9caa4257-1f93-4160-a944-74e33722f2a4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14301575

>>14301514
Reminder to ignore all pseudointellectual rhetoriticians and read theory.

>> No.14299693 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, 9caa4257-1f93-4160-a944-74e33722f2a4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14299693

>> No.14289989 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, 1575231240591.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14289989

>Muh human nature. Capitalism is our default state.
>Capitalism has only been around for the past 300 years
R___ th____

>> No.14288449 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, 1575468858080.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14288449

What's a right-wing version of this chart?

>> No.14287932 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, 1575142673260.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14287932

>>14286243
>The common cycle I see is 1. mainstream academics push fabricated study/experiment, 2. mainstream media promotes its, 3. legislation is passed based on it being true, 4. negative results follow, 5. a decade or so later after the damage has been done they admit there was fraud and own up to it.
Please post at least two decent examples of this "common cycle"

>> No.14286865 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, 1575231240591.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14286865

Reminder to ignore all pseudointellectial rhetoriticians and petit bougeois bugmen who can't into aesthetics and read theory instead.

>> No.14283717 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, 1575231240591.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14283717

Read theory incel

>> No.14279748 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, 1575231240591.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14279748

Reminder to ignore all pseudointellectial rhetoriticians and petit bougeois bugmen who have no taste for aesthetics and read theory instead.

>> No.14278998 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, 1575231240591.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14278998

Read theory incel.

>> No.14276336 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, 1575231240591.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14276336

>>14276333

>> No.14276123 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, 1575231240591.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14276123

Check out Blanchot. Not on the chart but The Book to Come is good. Deleuze Essays Critical and Clinical. Auerbach. Benjamin.

>> No.14273421 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, read theory.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14273421

*unmasks power level*

>> No.14272764 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, read theory.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14272764

Based and redpilled

>> No.14271904 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, read theory.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14271904

>> No.14271392 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, read theory.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14271392

Read theory incel

>> No.14271124 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, read theory.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14271124

What am I looking at here? Anyway take out Land and Brassier because they are hacks. Baudrillard isn't that good also, he had a bad reading of Marx. Add the Inhuman by Lyotard and Whitehead.and Blanchot.

>> No.14270836 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_1575224046668.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14270836

Start reading theory

>> No.14270796 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, read theory.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14270796

>>14270759
Read theory

>> No.14270693 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, 1575178404449.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14270693

What would you save from here.

>> No.14270369 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, read theory.jpg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14270369

This is what you get when no one reads theory.

>> No.14270176 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, read theory.jpg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14270176

Everyone on this chart.

>> No.14269969 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, read theory.jpg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14269969

He's reading theory.

>> No.14269875 [View]
File: 849 KB, 1352x3404, 1575178404449.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14269875

Navigation
View posts[-48][-24][+24][+48][+96]