/lit/ - Literature

>>7093315
A rhetorical tautology.
I provided a source,
Johnathan Fenby,
you simply did not like the source.

>You know this but for some reason want to save face in any way but admitting that you're wrong.
How do you mean wrong?
I provided information based on an historical book I read.
If you can not handle someone providing that,
then why do you reply?
If you do not like my source, then fine.
Don't respond.

Again, Ad hominem and all the things I posted in the post I just posted.

This isn't a dialectic exchange or a fun argument,
its paralytic trash.