/lit/ - Literature

>>17580139
I found the quality much higher than expected, not just of the writing, but of the book itself. Did you actually read the first two editions? They were entertaining, engaging, had a couple solid pieces of fiction in each, not to mention the short and to-the-point non-fiction, as well as the pleasant, tongue-in-cheek aesthetic. This is a great project. I think it could somehow sustain if it finds a sympathetic distributor. I see it along similar lines as Adbusters ten years ago, but with actual writing in it.

Also, LQ hasn't gone under. Fifth edition is at the printers now. Probably gonna be a gap between fifth and sixth edition, but that's due to the workload of the thing and some personal issues unrelated to the quarterly itself.

>>17580390
That never happened.