/lit/ - Literature

>>17479416
no it's the same difficulty as before, especially when it is about to renounce worldly pleasures

The only difference between atheism and whatever was before atheism, is that nowadays the plebeians care about politics too, instead of not giving a fuck who rules over them and the daily activities of the ruling class.
So nowadays even the plebeians identify themselves with the various atheist ideas. They say ''in our democracy'', ''or with science we know that'' or ''my company says this or that''.

This stuff adds a layer of spooks to clean off from the deeply neurotic nature of anything alive, but it's not that hard to remove for anybody who is not a woman or an autistic atheist.
The danger is that when an atheist takes a step back from those spooks , they think they outwit everybody and are enlightened, but they just stopped subscribing to the narrative of the ruling atheists, and they don't back up far enough to actually go back from worldly pleasures and then from meditation.
This is what happens to the '''''''''''''''''''''engaged buddhists'''''''''''''''''''''and all the atheists who think that buddhism is compatible with marxism, antifascism and so on.

reminder that women obsession with lust prevent them to be to be great people on their own