/lit/ - Literature

>>16092143
> a general audience
You mean morons and midwits?

>>14141652
>he studied empirically
He literally formed his theories by mystical experiences. He isn't "empirical" any more than Freud i.e. came up with a theory and interacted with people to confirm his theories.

>>14103376
>almost 2020's
>reading inane blogspot posts from the 2000's

>>14074085
totally epistemologically retarded

you have accounting identities o.k. and beyond that it becomes crypto-normative

>>14041162
All I've read from him is ad hominems against major 20th century figures who were much smarter than him. He doesn't refute anything (besides the contestable sources he cites) and just claims they were a little to licentious in their private lives as if every institution historically (and that includes the church) wasn't filled with more lewd activity at all points in time.

>>13992208
>EMH is law

>>13823114
>they would not choose our current market norms, because the people at the very bottom would not affirm such a system and would struggle to overthrow it

No, I don't think you're going to get anywhere near a consensus on an arrangement that mandates you may have to have sex with someone disgusting you stupid dumb bitter incel. No one wants people to be mandated and directed by the state to perform specific labour activities, a monetary system provides some choice in terminating any obligation to society. You can't even "cure" an incel by providing them with free whores since the problem is more than that. It's psychological and interpersonal. A different constitution can't make you lovable.

>>13730929
>real science
>basic math
>the LTV is in fact wholly discredited, and along with it the tendency of the rate of profit to fall, meaning there'll be no collapse of capitalism

>>13618018
>utility

>>13597322
Yes there has been: The bible

>>13562584
>you wouls have to be a total retard to thin those accounts disprove the Holocaust
You would be retarded to use those accounts to prove a holocaust.

>everyone who experiences war should have an accurate account of what happened
Now you're talking about victims of a "war" not people witnessing a supposed orchestrated policy of "genocide". Of course no one would expect everyone caught up in the middle of warfare to be able to deconstruct the full ideological contours of what's occurring right in front of them but that's what you're claiming is possible.

>expecting every refugee to have a perfect and objective account of an atrocity is a ridiculous level of verification which is pretty much self defeating
I would like some sort of verifiable theory of "genocide" anyhow without reference to every emotionally loaded tale coming from privileged individuals losing their social status during a revolution. Atrocity stories are constantly created and used politically, it doesn't matter if it's Iraqi soldiers taking babies out of incubators or Kim Jong Un feeding his uncle to piranhas.

>we would expect someone who is able to remain objective and detached through a genocide would be at the very least deeply psychologically troubled
Sure but you keep using the term "genocide" and from what I can tell no such thing occurred. Pol Pot didn't design and orchestrate any plan to kill all Cambodians. Some people surely died but how and why and who's to blame is very complex. Some "genocides" have really been orchestrated and executed by such groups as the Jews against the Canaanites and Anglo policy against various aboriginal populations in locales such as Tasmania.

The truth is Pol Pot is one of the most censored individuals historically speaking. Very few people have read him let alone understand him.

>>12748956
>Christians were way more tolerant of sodomy (which meant all non-strict heterosexual acts made not for the purpose of reproduction, including even zoophilia and necrophilia) than previous society were.
This level of revisionism is actually astonishing

>>12130927
>He for example completely neglects to mention the extraordinary over-representation and foundational influence of Jews in FDR's coup, and in laying the groundwork which led to it, which is the central event of his history and the center-point of his writing.

You're implying so much. Do you really mean Jews were exceptional in policy formation? I presume you've studied the ethnic makeup of all previous administrations? There was a legit coup plot but it wasn't by FDR:
http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/53-index.html

>>12130948
>anthony c sutton
That is the guy who was to kooky even for the conservative Hoover Institution. You're better off just going and looking into the primary sources he's citing:
http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-fdr-biblio.html

>Wiesel of course has supported Israel in every war, every repression, every murder, every action it has taken against neighbouring states. On the invasion of Lebanon and the bloody massacre of Palestinians carried out under Israeli direction, he said that he 'did not have first hand knowledge of the situation and trusted those who led Israel in whatever actions they took.' "He was a supporter of Israel - first, last and always - and not a critic and second guesser".

>On October 14, 1986 Wiesel received the Nobel Peace prize and is lauded for his moral stand on the Jewish Holocaust - but not about the more contemporary cases of mass murder which flow from both the country he now calls home and from his spiritual homeland.
>At his acceptance of the Nobel prize he repeats the spiel which he has been giving for 30 years. "I have devoted my life to a certain cause, the cause of memory, the cause of remembrance', Mr Wiesel said in New York where he lives. 'I owe something to the dead. That was their obsession, to be remembered. Anyone who does not remember betrays them again" ( New York Times , October 15/86., Globe and Mail , October 15/86).

ctrl+f: Elie Wiesel. Professional Holocaust Survivor
http://www.rolfknight.ca/HolocausFinalMarch07.pdf

>>11823582

>>11815836
>Nick Land’s theory of Blockchain technology solves the problems that both Einstein and Poincare were facing
Yup, that's the good stuff

>a priori
>praxeology
>ethics

yup, y'all retarded ideological victims of a philosophically overdetermined world view

>this entire thread

>>11300369
Literally top reddit/youtube tier pseudosciencist

>>11300894
If he had a degree in alchemy that would literally be less cringy than psychology

>>11225908
>Pinker

>>11226597
>Modern neurobiology proved