/lit/ - Literature

determinism is a condition in which everything happens in chain, cause effect cause effect and so on, no one can escape and no one can change it. To believe in this, you have:
1) to use your mind to create the concept of logic first, and decide what’s correlated and what’s not, ergo using your senses.
2) so, the concept of logic, if you are in the deterministic model, must be a process caused by your own chain of causality
3) so technically you cannot say logically if your logic is logic, or biased, because, if you are the result of your causality, there is no way for you to recognize that you are in mistake
4) so you have to put logic above causality, and assume it is correct the way it is
Leading to: to believe in determinism you must use a non-deterministic concept first (an utopian, unfallacy, abstractian logic), making your belief irrational (because in determinism there cannot be such things as you cannot know if the causal chains leads to a mistake or not, in the end you just believing in rationality). Ergo determinism cannot exist without the imposition we made at the beginning, using the very brain that it is the result of its own chain of event (not-provable of its own correctness), which it is a presupposition itself that determinism cannot exist.
To sum up, if you say determinism exists, you are assuming your logic is above chain of event because you simply can’t know if your reasoning and rationality is correct, ignoring that that very logic is (as everything would be) a result of a chain of event you cannot say if you are right or wrong, making your assumption in determinism just another religion
Logic imposes that believing in determinism, even if it is correct, is irrational.