/lit/ - Literature

>>21695166
oh heavens above my little tinyman no no no, it's an objective observation of what is happening in the real world and my/our attempt to see the positive sides to it.

Technically speaking, if a opposed was bitterly opposed to (that) it would be because they were a tinyman or a stupidman who recognized that they belonged sucking cock in the first place. Speaking for myself anyway I'm far too tall and huge, and tinymen have tiny penises so, even if I WANTED TO it would still be a joke to me to consider the err.. 'bbc type' as being 'manly', you see what I mean?

>>21520494
that's eunuchs.

Trannies, I've reconciled, are a fine and fair way to get betaboyz out of the masculine camp and making us look stupid by being all cringeable and petty-minded. Many american jock types would be better off as trannies, in fact, most men probably, if you're under 6'5 and your IQ is below 200 you may as well check out of the hunter-warrior branch of the species.

Not,I hasten to add,that the betaboyz are anything like Women at all but.. you know, it's easier to understand the sub-human slave stock human as a kind of perpetual teenage girl.