/lit/ - Literature

zizek already agreed to debate land, the only relevant right wing philosopher not some e celeb

you mean in the 90s when it created accelerationism

they dont think it be like it does but it do

>>19370517
At least your whole country isn't range-banned.

you guys ready for zoomers to get into nick land and a new wave of accelerationism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJISIwit0tk

>>13781672
Not as many as are going to die in the techno apocalypse
and that's a good thing

>>13709729
Oh man, depending on your interests this should set you down a deep rabbit hole.

Try these for starters/search Nick Land and CCRU.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/11/accelerationism-how-a-fringe-philosophy-predicted-the-future-we-live-in

https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/philosophy/nick-land-the-alt-writer

http://divus.cc/london/en/article/nick-land-ein-experiment-im-inhumanismus

I'm a Maths&Phil student @Bristol btw.

>>13002293
Not an argument.

>>13002293
Communism and fascism are dead. What the elite and most everyone have not realized is the only things left are anarchism and accelerationism.

Oh, they want to be critical of the commies in a post cold war world?.....

There is only one man who can do that who isnt an anarchist.

>>12968441

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LITHAzXSrps

What is the real differences between left and right accelerationism? It seems like overlap quite a bit. Is there a third positionist accelerationism?

>>12770223
>whether accelerationists believe that this will achieve the collapse of the system a la Ted K or rather a transformation into a new type of global system.
Depends on the type of acclerationism
L/acc believes that through complete deterritorialization (and proper reterritorialization) of capital a utopia can be created
R/acc and U/acc are more ateleological and transhumanism oriented, and see humanity as a temporary host of capital's expansion, and that eventually the same deterritorialization process will lead to post-humanity advancement
that's what I've gathered at least

THE STORY GOES LIKE THIS:

>>12230651
Technology will destroy *human* society. The market and capital will be fine though

>>12180096
Not going to lie, I kek'd.

>>10804627
Third dog gets the bone.

https://vincentgarton.com/2017/06/12/unconditional-accelerationism-as-antipraxis/

>edgy
>deep and obscurantist
>doesn't require you to actually do anything

Is accelerationism the most /lit/ ideology?