/lit/ - Literature

>>10163056
>creationism
Because it's based on a crude and unnecessary understanding of Genesis.
>literalism
Because of the sheer ignorance of it all.
None of this relates to tradition. >>10163131 is partially correct. In the early church there were many divergent views about genealogies which caused confusion, along with a bit of Psalms that they related to it. Rabbis that influenced them were they, themselves, mixed on it.

Young Earth Creationism is a revival of very old interpretation of Christian views that have been rationally dismissed for much of the church's history. What is called "Biblical Literalism" is what is a 19th century Protestant invention, however, primarily because it is a viewing of Biblical texts without regards to genres because iy assumes modern styles about it.

>>6510234
>Christianity was fundamentally a rejection of pagan natural law.
u wot m8
You're either stating "pagan natural law" is separate from "natural law" or ignoring the teaching of God's law being written on a hearts of all man.

Zizek is wrong if you're asserting the latter and you'll have to explain further if you're asserting the former.