/lit/ - Literature

>>21277308
>2022
>Expecting consistency from women
You're judging women by the wrong standards.

>>21278686
There's no age at which arguing with girls/women becomes a fruitful activity. Backhand them to the face and bend them over your knee - it's much faster, and to women's credit they seem to enjoy it much more as well.

>>21277877
And it was the best thing the bishops ever did. Women are semi-sentient sextoys, so putting them in specialty stores where they can be used without long-term commitment is exactly what should be done.

>>21280150
The ones that read vapid romance or YA fiction, mostly.

>>21280870
Most of that isn't true. What is true, however, is that women are naturally more submissive than men, and this gives them an edge in the school system. All of that disappears the moment people enter jobs where self-initiative and ambition are of any value, which is why woke retards are trying to replace all of that with mere credentialism.

>>21281002
Out of these the only field that even arguably is not biased, either by institutions or sexual selection, is the artist one - and in the time of social media even that is dubious. Just having a female name makes people hold you to a lower standard, and be satisfied with a lower performance.