/lit/ - Literature

>Actualism

>>22997315
You have to take into consideration the roots of online culture, remember, computers used to be nerd shit that women completely ignored (because Chad preferred sports and "going outside") up until the early 2000s and even then women went to places where a great of socialization happened, like Myspace. In the early days of the internet it was mostly men that went on places like usenet and message boards. Women stuck with chat rooms where a greater degree of instant gratification was possible. Therefore, it was a defense mechanism developed to avoid females from disrupting a traditionally Male-centric camaraderie.

>>22880015
>"lmao lmao lmao" like a fucking retarded retard...
Got a PhD in Mathematics?
>N-no...
Cool, you can go ahead and shut the fuck up like you know anything about Mathematics.

>basic facts about the Golden Ratio are post-doc Number Theory
LITERALLY EVERYTHING IS WRONG ABOUT HOW YOU THINK.

First off, scalar base systems, like Base Phi, are a thing, second, there is no "basic facts" when talking about attributes in all scales of reality, Physics or Mathematics, third, post-doc refers to radically abstract and novel forms of mathematics that are too definitionally altered from traditional Pure Maths, and too new to be taught in Physics...which it this case belongs to.
Physics via Number Theory.

HENCE, POST-DOCTORATE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.

Let me know when you graduate with either Physics or Maths...then I can lecture you on how little your professors taught you about either in terminology you cant LARP you understand while denying the truth.

>>22569825
It only takes me 9 months to write a manuscript

>>22565923
A Game of Thrones is finished and so are four of its sequels.

>>22071611
Lemmings don't actually follow each other off of cliffs. In a Walt Disney documentary, producers chased a herd of lemmings off a cliff with a bulldozer, thus starting the persistent myth which is still commonly believed today.

>Its funny because some of the most respected esotericists alive running Masonic lodges, initiatic organizations, working with aristocrats and Royalty and spying for intel agencies are Traditionalists. They love discussing Guénon and Evola at the higher levels of Freemasonry. You're just a pleb.

>>20578103
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/762670.Marcus_Aurelius_in_Love

>John 15:7
>If you abide in me, and my words abide in you, ask whatever you wish, and it will be done for you.

WELL YOU SEE ACKCHYUALLY WHAT JESUS MEANT WAS THE OPPOSITE OF THAT.

>>19428883
> If there was a moment when the culture of enlightened modernity in the United States gave way to the sickly culture of romantic primitivism, it was when the movie “Star Wars” premiered in 1977. A child of the 1960s, I had grown up with the optimistic vision symbolized by “Star Trek,” according to which planets, as they developed technologically and politically, graduated to membership in the United Federation of Planets, a sort of galactic League of Nations or UN. When I first watched “Star Wars,” I was deeply shocked. The representatives of the advanced, scientific, galaxy-spanning organization were now the bad guys, and the heroes were positively medieval — hereditary princes and princesses, wizards and ape-men. Aristocracy and tribalism were superior to bureaucracy. Technology was bad. Magic was good.

Libertarians are primitives.

>>19362724
>>19363088
It's called the Farseer trilogy.

>>18723282
It is clear that OP has never consumed media first-hand, has never been to university or worked for any bigger cooperation. The opinions are so diverse that you can't just agree with everyone without contradicting yourself.

It's something I do without thinking about. Though it is a good kind of exercise for the mind it fills my mind with all the literal, obvious opinions any idiot has.
>Have you overcome this problem? Is there a surreal approach or a more witty approach to writing comments?

>>17219709
The fact that you're still a racist likely proves all your efforts were pointless

how do you not be on the nose when writing poetically?

Been told to read more poetry.
How do I self study poetry?

>Ask me how I know you don't

>>15282702

>>15278993
It robs the victim of their agency in choosing what happens to their body, that’s all the justification you need to say rape is bad. It doesn’t matter how much or how little the victim suffered since as long as their right to choose has been violated then it’s still rape.
let me modify the scenario a little bit. Let’s say that before the rapist commits the assault he decides to hypnotize the girl. He has now made the girl believe that she wants and desires the assault, and she is also now mentally incapable of experiencing the physical pain of the rape. He then commits the assault and now they both walk away happier than before. If we judge this event solely based off of how much suffering was caused then we would have to say that him hypnotizing her is a moral good. However that’s a stupid conclusion. If we look at agency then we can say that even though the girl didn’t suffer from the rape since her agency was violated by the hypno rape (since the victim would obviously not want to be assaulted if she had retained her original mind) the we can say that rape is bad

>>14676717
this kind

>>13780948
I have not judged the book, just the cover

>>13716363
Gryphus

>>13087311
It's science fantasy m8. The setting is sci-fi but the story reads like fantasy.

>>13037632
No. 'Intellectual' isn't an honorary title for smart people, it's a profession: if you support yourself by spreading ideas, you're an intellectual. An engineer isn't an intellectual, because they are judged by the result, the product that they offer. If the bridge an engineer builds collapses, he will be judged negatively, whereas an intellectual pays no price should the ideas they produce and spread fail. Just look at all the intellectuals who spawned, spread and advocate for communism.