/lit/ - Literature

Why do you faggots keep arguing about this shit? This whole thread has been repeated ad nauseam for at least a year now, just fuck off already

>>12812873
>Being so retarded you don't understand what a re-contexualization and socially constructed pathologization is.
>Hurr durr my science
It literally destroys 90% of the feeling and sexual pleasure in your genitals dumbass. Those same studies also say that it would never be ethical to subject children to, as well as having a prophylaxis so in-effective it results in random chance (and they say you should still always wear a condom regardless). You also can't legally get cough syrup on a store shelf with the degree of prophylaxis they allege. Its all just misdirection and slight of hand to reassure deluded idiots like yourself there's nothing wrong with you. Just like the hundreds of other bullshit reasons people have cooked up over the past 100+ years.

>>11810261
>i dont even know how it happened
I can think of a few reasons.

>>11392036
But the blurbs purpose is not to spoil the plot of the novel but to make you interested in said novel.
Said novel specifically pointing out that our brave native heroine has three fathers (none of whom is actually her father) and five mothers (at the point at which that evil masked empire tried civilizing her people) is a gentle nod to the all "progressive" readers out there to pick up this woke work of art.
The issue here is that any work pandering to this kind of people means that in all likelihood the novel is a boring derivative drivel.
Now I might be wrong, but after getting burned by the The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet I just don't have the time or the will to check it out.
It is all so very, very tiresome.

ITT: Names for your book.