/lit/ - Literature

>>13893818
This is the nature of influence and thought. We are all 'programmed' by our genetics, our environment, and by other people. No one can just instantiate their thoughts and behaviours out of nowhere. Additionally, most people don't have the intelligence to process all the nuance/complexity of reality nor philosophies which more accurately describe it -- hence the role of more general ideology. Unfortunately, heuristics and 'feels before reals' is usually the best we can do when it comes to general public. As for paranoiacs, obsessives or just dumb people, they are ubiquitous and not unique to any particular ideological perspectives.

So, the real issue is which positions are more truthful and likely to produce healthy+sustainable results for the people that adopt them. Your implication of white nationalist/third positionist ideologues as being insincere is a result of your own bias (programming?), as is the notion that only your ideological opponnents are 'programmed'.

>>11742711
If it's a complete strawman then make the counter argument. Why do you have to suck the dick of authority?

>>11740678
REMINDER. Don't just assume the existence of an is-ought 'problem' to begin with.