[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.6469262 [View]
File: 715 KB, 1600x1200, 1430088694904.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6469262

>>6468983
yes you got a point

>> No.6432406 [View]
File: 715 KB, 1600x1200, 1429515695038.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6432406

>>6432402
WRRRRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYy

>> No.6428332 [View]
File: 715 KB, 1600x1200, 1429515695038.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6428332

>>6427153
I feel very comfortable saying "Ayn Rand is a meme philosopher"

>> No.6170885 [View]
File: 715 KB, 1600x1200, 1420015219975.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6170885

Feminism, not tumblr feminism, but the actual bare idea of women being equal to men, is self-defeating and really just naïve.

It essentially subordinates the concept of femininity by implying it as a failed version of masculinity. Of course this IS absolutely true from a male perspective, and this is exactly why feminism is a product of patriarchic logic. If you look at it from a female perspective (which is discursively impossible as language and discourse itself are inherently masculine, but if we remember from Wittgenstein discourse ≠ reality, merely its coincident delineation), you will see that femininity, stay at home concubine sheltered protected femininity, is 'already' good enough, and that it does not need to become anything else than what it has already, historically been.

People derive ideas like the oppression of women out of history without bothering to think if it's actually just supposed to be that way, and that calling it 'oppression' really makes as much sense as calling your mattress 'oppressed by its sheets'.

/validity of feminism

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]