/lit/ - Literature

It's over....

>>18189723
>>18189946
When it comes to the males the sexual preference doesn't matter at all. You don't need to train males to be attracted to thick amazon mommies they're going to want to hump the shit out of them anyway so I don't concern myself with that. The women is the problem here.

About 6% of women show no size preference whatsoever. Whatever causes these women to have no preference can be identified. I think that it's completely socialized. I don't think that there is some innate thing that causes women to have size preferences in males, I think they're taught to need to feel small and protected and this turns into a height fetish. What this means is that the women who grow up in environments where they do not have a male taller norm are not going to care about being big like that. We already know of societies that have no male taller norm where the women universally have no size preference in males. So the amazon women will think it's normal to be big. They won't be taught that they need to be small or take up less space. They will feel GOOD about being tall and heavy and thick and fecund.

However, if there is a set of genes that code for this, they most likely would be polygenetic and hard to find. I must admit that this is the most difficult part about this whole thing. If you want to join the cult then help figure out whatever it is that causes size preference in females so it can be removed. If it's cultural than we don't actually have to worry about this and it most likely is cultural.

>>18139828
Debatable, in any case it goes against the claim of anon.
Unfortunate choice of analogy for a thread about women. Two inches in height is far from irrelevant to them.