/lit/ - Literature

>>8900412
From the researchgate link you posted
>There was a high degree of concordance across tests and no sex difference was observed in overall estimates of general intellectual ability (GIA) on the WJ III.
>tfw autist posted a study that went against what he was initially trying to argue

>>8900485
It's laughable that you think all men by default are occupied with greatness. It's very likely that men are, in a general sense, more focused on their own 'legacy' than women are, and the reasons for this should be explored. But to say no woman out there strives to be great is about as misguided as saying all men strive to be great.
>I did not claim women can't be great
>why don't women possess the 'concept' of greatness
So women can be 'great' but they don't actually have a concept of what is great? Are you autistic? It seems to me you're simply looking for affirmation of your own bias perspective. Have you ever actually had an intelligent conversation with a woman who you weren't trying to fuck?

>>8824740

>>8361799
You sly fox you

>>5763981
>shitty book series

>he is actually a top-tier Director/Screenwriter