[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.18859635 [View]
File: 147 KB, 440x774, 440px-After_Hans_Holbein_the_Younger_-_Portrait_of_Henry_VIII_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>18859538
>>18859626
Friends, countrymen, people who hate OP, lend me your ears; I come to bury OP, not to praise it. To begin at the beginning, OP is frightened that we might move ahead with a process that serves the interests of our country and all its citizens. That’s why it’s trying so hard to prevent whistleblowers from reporting that, as I like to say, "OP fails to consider the consequences of its complaints". Those may be harsh words, but I assert I have a fundamental right to say them. I also have the right to say that we must fight against social injustice. This call to action begins with you. You must be the first to have a little confab with it about its jejune propositions. You must be the one to pave the way for people of every sex, race, and socioeconomic status to fulfill their own spiritual destiny. And you must inform your fellow man that OP has been trying hard to convince us that the rule of law should give way to the rule of brutality and bribery. It inarguably has a knack for refining snake oil to unprecedented purity, potency, and opacity, doesn’t it? In any case, OP’s jaundiced, obnoxious game of chess—the abysmal chess of Cæsarism—has continued for far too long. It’s time to checkmate this stubborn nithing and show it that Bonapartism-oriented curmudgeons guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like a vital community. That said, we mustn’t lose sight of who our real enemies are: OP and its maladroit spokesmen. All this aside, OP’s animadversions are negativism cloaked in the rhetoric of obscene, hubristic nosism. Sometimes it helps us to think clearly about this by turning to an analogy, let’s say with animals. Imagine a bunny who’s merrily keeping our courage up. Suddenly, a couple of wolves come along and sacrifice children on the twin altars of sexism and greed. Because of the wolves’ actions, the bunny is unable to awaken people from the spell of tribalism. If that analogy helps, good. If not, well, just ignore it. In either case, the moral is that OP’s argument that its chicaneries are good for the environment, human rights, and baby seals is hopelessly flawed and completely circuitous. Comments on the above are welcome, but please think them out first.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]