/lit/ - Literature

>>14896026
>Plato
>Hume

>>14851518
Socrates did read though?

>>14715636
If you simply adopt the contrary value, you haven't escaped their influence; and by standing in opposition to them, you are perpetuating their 'eternal form' precisely through that opposition. A question referring to >>14715587 this post: the OP seems to suggest predominantly social philosophies, yet here you are referring to metaphysics (specifically universals)? can you expand further on what you mean (in general, but also) by
>the movement of universal philosophy isn’t static but any ever evolving thing which moves laterally between metaphysical constraints of the material world
and, isn't
>you can argue about anything depending on reference point and environmental perspective
itself Stable Ground?

>>14667452
Why not anon? unless you're on your deathbed, i don't see why it could never happen.