/lit/ - Literature

>>12444340
>10 seconds
but you see time is, as einstein once hypothesized, relative and so could one really said with certainty that 10 seconds have pass? how can we be sure 10 seconds for you are the same as 10 seconds for me? one could, and pardon for playing devils advocate here; argue that from the perspective of the universe only one second has passed. ergo, I'm afraid this theoretical game cannot take place at all. concordantly vis-à-vis erwin shrodinger once postulated, everything is and isnt until its beholded and so one cannot say time has occurred at all, after all the assumption that one can observe time is preposterous.
sincerely. a thinker

Does anyone have experience writing about literature for a website? I have an opportunity to do it for a not totally obscure site. The issue is that the current content is garbage, 95% of it is pleb shit and the remaining 5% isn't amazing. Is it worth it?

Pros:
>people will actually see my writing
>gives experience for better jobs in the future, good since I don't have any real qualifications
>potential networking opportunities

Cons:
>my content might not get read very much
>might be forced to write bad content, might be fired in disgrace for not doing so
>potentially a massive time sink

Conservative "thought" is intellectually worthless. When pressed on these issues right-wingers will invariably end up stating:
>I don't like this group of people!
>I'm better than this group of people!
>Society has been like this for a long time so it must be right!
>Change scares me!
All their beliefs are rooted in one of the above. They might try to be sly and avoid admitting it directly, because deep down they know their positions are irrational, but it's easy to see through.

>>10597633
Quantum physics

>133 IQ
feels good

>>9840808

>>9063606