[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.10398230 [View]
File: 110 KB, 1920x1080, david chalmers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10398230

"the virgin dualist"

>> No.10360183 [View]
File: 110 KB, 1920x1080, david chalmers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10360183

>>10359734
>The need for mind-body dualism comes out of sentimentality and a fear of death, nothing less. There's no more reason to believe a person has a soul than a chair does.
Good thing there are reasons to believe a chair has a soul

>> No.10231030 [View]
File: 110 KB, 1920x1080, david chalmers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10231030

>>10231026
>implying dualism is dead

>> No.10195226 [View]
File: 110 KB, 1920x1080, david chalmers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10195226

>>10195202

>> No.10165812 [View]
File: 110 KB, 1920x1080, david chalmers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165812

physicalists btfo!

>> No.8835465 [View]
File: 110 KB, 1920x1080, maxresdefault (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8835465

What are your opinions on the "hard problem" of consciousness as outlined by David Chalmers? Does it exist, or is it a bullshit attempt to bring dualism into the 21st century?

Note that what's being discussed here is any and all forms of subjectivity, not human consciousness vs. animal consciousness or anything like that.

Posted this on /sci/ earlier and didn't get any really novel answers, so I'm trying here.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]