/lit/ - Literature

>>12194056
That maybe. I would think that someone with that knowledge would understand what kind of potential terrible power he could inflict on others or on the other hand how pathetic and unnecessary it would be to do anything good seeing as how the emergent layers, which is the objective law, is already in place. That's my guess

>>11343485
Wonder is programmed into the psyche. It is my guardian spirit. I am a fractal blood cell moving in a stream watching his flow.

I've been reading a lot of religious propaganda just to make sure I'm right lately. It seems that when it comes to explaining why everything exists, religious people think it means not the cause, but meaning. A cause for the wind blowing can be found, but there is no meaning in it. It's an abstract concept that doesn't make sense in real world. Also, I found that religious people have never read any Einstein and think that time is something linear, and therefore there's a definite beginning of "all that exists", and so there must be something that predated it. Why can't they understand that even though we don't understand the nature of time enough to say what it really is at this point (and some scientists say time may as well be just an abstract concept), we know that time is not linear, it's different everywhere, and that means there are endless possibilities of explaining the origins of the known. Are religious people just brainlets?