/lit/ - Literature

>>16473742
Well, technology is essentially to maintaining a state not able to be butt raped by other states, so the dismantling in a national setting is impossible since it completely eradicates any international leverage you have.

Technocracy, in the sense that instead of a democracy, we just have a quasi-democracy for party members and industries are represented by elected representatives (who also have to be party members) in a chamber, going back and forth on legislation. It’s made to merge the interests of the workers with that of the party, and the party itself is by design mostly composed of young people who worked in the “private” sector (composed of more flexible Quangos, carrying out contracts for departments overseeing the fulfillment of things) for a few years, got out of it.