/lit/ - Literature

>>18249937
>Let's be honest, 90% of you don't actually dislike Hegel, you just like the meme of calling people who like Hegel “obscure" and "difficult" and be le epic funny about “hegel is a dark magician” plus "something to do with Marx"

I find people complaining about hegel more of a fucking meme than people trying to parse him desu-sempai. you seem more performative then they.

>>18242020
i agree with your first part about why its romantissiced. its the ultimate stage with the ultimate stakes, shows peoples most extreme nature both good and bad. its an ultimate test. I think libdybeige actually explianed it quite well. i think a lot of his stuff is kinda stupid, but this point here is what i agree on: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dBI1Hplnghs

on your second point, I actually disagree, I dont think we are “past that point”. we still glorify it. you dont fundementally have to think something is good to glorify it. we are still obsessed with the stage of ultimate stakes. I might agree if there was less war media in general, but action stuff is still very popular. being dubious of its cause dosbt detract from it essentially quala.

>>18242036
ok schitzo, i only wrote >>18241698
and >>18241709

>>18215414
>Why do people use x’s quotes, a multifaceted person who apreciatted different aspects of different things to promote y that he might have not fully endorsed but apreciated aspects of?

why are you so bloody miopic? people dont fit in tight little boxes of demographic use.

People can apreciate and quote augustine wothoit being a christian, you can quote marc without being a marxist, you can quote plato without agreeing with THE REPUBLIC. people usually are not diometricly opposed to others and can appreciate aspects of a larger whole they dont agree with.

why are you a fucking retard?