/lit/ - Literature

>>3730844
Yea, I always suggest "100 Questions" and "My Life" by Sir Oswald Mosley, "The Doctrine of Fascism" which is credited to Mussolini but he had a ghost writer pen it, "Système de Politique Positive" by Comte and "The 26 Point Plan" by Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera. A lot of people on /lit/ seem to enjoy Evola, he was a bit too fruity for me but I did enjoy "Metaphysics of War".

For Scholarly works or reference material that remains somewhat objective "The Birth of Fascist Ideology" by Zeev Sternhell and Griffins "International Fascism: Theories, Causes and the New Consensus".

I explained this yesterday in another thread but it is always something I feel I need to bring up while addressing Fascism; it is not an inherently racialist ideology, in fact most traditional Fascist opposed racialism because the collective always transcends the individual. There is no room for multiculturalism or racial separatism - all races must be equally integrated into the national structure. It is not a matter of race but of the cultural identity and connection with our Nation. The Nazi's were Fascists, yes, but they added "scientific" racialism to Fascism (among other things like a mixed economy) and saw the race as the Nation rather than their culture and land. I always bring this up because the media has rebranded the term over the past 50 years to mean "racist, bigot, ignorant, etc." We see Stormfront types, and "White Nationalists" as traitors and idiots, nothing more than liberals with klan robes whining about "white genocide" and "muh rights!".