/lit/ - Literature

Because consuming animal products is in my nature and thus good for me. The (((naturalistic fallacy))) is not a fallacy.

>>15625931
>I often ask if anyone has read Redwall, and I get blank stares
Everyone read them, they just don't want to admit it and risk being labeled as a furry

>>15626540
>Outcast of Redwall
That was fantastic

>>15628290
>"Woodlanders good, Vermin bad" is flawed due to its simplic design
Ecology exists, and some critters cannot survive without preying on other critters. When they abstain from it anyway, that's more morally complex, and that's what makes Redwall great. See >>15630757

The book is not bad enough to drop, but not good enough to keep reading.

Is alt-lit shit because or in spite of its doing its best to be shit?

No.