/lit/ - Literature

>>11981659
all just schizophrenia, he says.

you've got some reading to do. here are the guys you need: Hegel, Marx, Heidegger, Lacan, Deleuze. read those guys. forget Land for now. just get a handle on those guys. and then whatever you think about Land will probably be interesting. you don't even have to read Land himself, although after you have read those guys you may want to, because he is very much a part of that story.

Kojeve's book on Hegel is also worth your time at some point, although if you are an absolute Day-1 beginner to philosophy i recommend Tarnas' "The Passion of the Western Mind," followed by Jacques Barzun's "From Dawn to Decadence. Zimmerman's guide to Heidegger later b/c Heidegger can be a tall order. and Marty Glass' Yuga too, that's a special book.

but there is a lot that happens along the way before Land. and you don't even need to read Land either. but it's a little more than so much word salad.

>>11981665
>I think Girard guy read something he didn't understand he fried his brains.
it's possible. i don't claim to be an expert, that's for sure. i have a lot more questions than answers. and i'm self-taught in all of this, warrants mentioning. so yeah, i don't recommend that anyone take me or my Awesome Opinions too seriously. i am somewhat dementedly obsessed with these themes and i have been for a couple of years now, but...yeah, it's basically just a radio channel in text form. i ramble and talk to myself. sometimes with other people too, which is nice. but mos def i am not to be taken seriously. think of it like an old curiosity/antique shop under a bridge somewhere in a rough part of town, staffed by weird and shadowy figures and selling Strange Artifacts at weird hours. that's basically me, a squalid rag-and-bone shop of continental philosophy relics and fragments, likely stolen from elsewhere and gathering dust. and yet - look, look! - see how they glow
>madness intensfies
>wait don't go
>ah fuck we lost another one

>Just listen to Land interviews/podcasts, he is very clear post-CCRU.
true.

>>11981694
i know Tymienicka, she's got pages upon pages of stuff on libgen. Schelling obviously but i've never read him extensively. there are some Schelling-anons on /lit/ tho. the others not so much.