/lit/ - Literature

>>19365094
The Gathas

>>19365897
>many ethnic groups that was
many ethnic groups that were*

also bbl

>>17844327
All of West Eurasia was meant to be Zoroastrian.

Constantine fabricated his vision of Jewsus during a march against spiritually superior Sassanids. He wanted to use Nestorian minority as a fifth column against superior Sassanids.
Islam was an invention of Catholic Byzantines and Heraclius, and the Byzantines secretly aided Bedouin Rashidun during key battles. It was a fluid and temporary alliance.
J*daism began out of inferiority complexity and to win favor from magnanimous Achaemenids.
Jewsus, Moses, and Muhammad do not exist and were historical fictions.

This is the real redpill of history: Pisslam, Cuckstianity, and J*daism all grew due to inferiority complex towards the magnificent, glorious Achaemenids or Sassanids.
Abrahamism has no culture.
Every single Cuckstian, Mudslime, and Jew will plummet to the House of Lies.
Buddhists, Hindus, Zoroastrians, etc. are all good.

>>17737744
All of West Eurasia was meant to be Zoroastrian.

Constantine fabricated his vision of Jewsus during a march against spiritually superior Sassanids. He wanted to use Nestorian minority as a fifth column against superior Sassanids.
Islam was an invention of Catholic Byzantines and Heraclius, and the Byzantines secretly aided Bedouin Rashidun during key battles. It was a fluid and temporary alliance.
J*daism began out of inferiority complexity and to win favor from magnanimous Achaemenids.
Jewsus, Moses, and Muhammad do not exist and were historical fictions.

This is the real redpill of history: Pisslam, Cuckstianity, and J*daism all grew due to inferiority complex towards the magnificent, glorious Achaemenids or Sassanids.
Abrahamism has no culture.
Every single Cuckstian, Mudslime, and Jew will plummet to the House of Lies.
Buddhists, Hindus, Zoroastrians, etc. are all good.

>>17315076

I've encountered many "intellectuals" who have read the Upanishads, Dao de Jing, Bible, Koran, Old Testament, Dhammapada, and so forth, but rarely have they ever read the Gathas, the unaltered words of Zoroaster. Why? I think it's because Jews to a large extent decide your academic curriculum.

The Roman Emperor Constantine fabricated a vision on the way to a battle against the Sassanians to consolidate his seat as emperor, and he used Christianity to rally support against the spiritually superior Sassanians.

>>16809387
>>16816453
>>16816569
The reason Europe suffers is because the Byzantine empire picked Christianity over Zoroastrianism and sided with the Rashidun to take over Sassanian empire. Cuckstianity and Pisslam grew to alliance to overthrow an Aryan tradition, which they both bastardized.
All of West Eurasia would have been better off as Zoroastrian.
Start with the Gathas, not Semitic filth. Also, I am writing a book that will offer a new form of spirituality over Abrahamic filth.

>>16800131
Rashidun and Byzantines actually joined forces to take on Sassanids because the first two consider themselves Abrahamic brothers.

>>16793975
>>16793964
>>16793990
>>16794074
>>16794086
>>16794106
>>16794422
>>16794433
Hmm, a lot of you guys seem to be repeating the message of the Gathas, which is the only part of the Zend-Avesta which goes back to Zoroaster. In the modern West, the Gathas tend to be ignored during world religion classes, probably due to either political purposes or simply ignorance. Regardless, the Gathas is foundational in its distinction between asha (truth, order) and druj (lie, chaos), and it promotes privileging the path of asha over druj. It argues a "sick mind is one that dabbles in lies" and also implies "relativism destabilizes society and results in chaos". The Gathas contrasts Mahayana Buddhism and Vedanta in that it does not argue that truth and lie exist in a complementary dynamic.

The spirit of the Gathas is found in much fiction and even popular media. Anything that involves truth/righteousness/order overcoming lie/deceit/malevolence/chaos has roots in Zoroaster's teachings, which are embodied in the Gathas. The Gathas are the only text which descends from Zoroaster, which originates somewhere in Transoxiana and dates to ~800-1200 BC.
Furthermore, let's contrast two Indo-Iranian-derived belief systems: Zoroastrianism and Hinduism. In the former, evil is typically banished whereby the good prevails whereas in the latter good and evil intermingle and blur, revealing their duality to be fictitious (maya). Zoroastrianism gave formative influence to Abrahamic traditions with the introduction of a battle between order and chaos, angels versus demons, heaven vs. hell, a bridge to salvation, and more, but its philosophical basis of dualism is best embodied in the Gathas.
Even popular media like Zelda and Dragon Quest should be called Zoroastrian in origin since it involves a quest of purifying evil. In this sense, Zoroastrianism had many parallels with Shintoism, especially given the fixation on purification rituals.
Even the quest for truth untainted by lie is Zoroastrian in nature. In Chinese mythology, the hundun (the primordial chaos) shows truth and lie are intertwined in a manner that is complementary or recursive. However, Zoroastrianism and the traditions it influenced show a fundamental and irreconcilable distinction between truth (asha) and lie (druj).
One gets a strong sense of Zoroastrian aesthetic influence from Arthurian myths and certain aspects of Christianity. The paladin is the best symbol of Zoroastrianism. It is not surprising that the cataphract armor of Sassanids influenced the British.
Moreover, Zarathustra was not a Persian and may have been a Scythian who were largely white, but his early followers around BMAC area were brown though. The stuff regarding the whiteness of Buddha, Jesus, and Muhammad are all nonsense though.

>>15698617
>>15701333
Together we will usher a new era with the destruction of Yahweh-Moloch.

t. Zoroastrian

>>15633076
Well, it is possible Zoroaster was a Scythian, which are pretty much white, and did look like that though his first adherents in Central Asia, where he migrated to in order to preach, were somewhat brown.

Zoroaster was better than Jesus, Muhammad, and other filthy Abrahamic figures.

Zarathustra
>based wise man from the steppes
>message of moral dualism clear and simple, no guilt-tripping or being a war maniac
>cared for preserving biodiversity, which influenced Mani
>strong man of integrity
>closely related to Europeans due to high steppe admixture

Jesus
>Jew
>disgusting vermin who promotes guilt over nothing
>narcissist
>ugly
>didn't care for natural world

Muhammad
>pedo
>war mongerer
>ugly Bedouin
>narcissist
>blood-thirsty

Anyone who disagrees is an idiot. All of West Eurasia should have become Zoroastrian. All of West Eurasia includes North Africa, Europe, and Middle East. ALL of you should have embraced the divine fire.