/lit/ - Literature

>>15428959
>so he was even more retarded than I thought
How is that retarded?
>this isn't proof of Hyperborea,
Nobody has ever said that it has been indisputably proven, however there is still copious evidence for it
>we would have a plethora of evidence about them.
And we do in the form of Vedic and Avestas passages describing the arctic, and the the same idea of the ancient northern home appearing in the Greek and other cultures, in Guenon's book 'Symbolism of the Cross' in his chapter on the Swastika he even cites an incident in 1925 where some natives in Panana revolted against the police and established their own native republic, with the flag being a swastika and the name of the republic Tulé (Thule, another name for Hyperborea), showing that even the Native Americans were descended from or carried some knowledge of the Hyperborean traditon. If you mean "physical ruins" than their absence could be explained by the fact that they built mainly wood buildings. There have been very few archaeological digs in the arctic circle, it's not like they looked but didn't find it.