/lit/ - Literature

>>12525148
I should say, I've read the Art of the Argument, which provides some clarity on whether he's talking about 'the world' or 'the statement on the world' so I couldn't honestly say whether his explanation in UPB is sufficient for the point he's making. It seems to not be from what you're saying though.

If I had to take a guess, I would say that his popularity is crippling him. So many people are accepting his ideas uncritically that he doesn't refine them as well as he should. If more people were like you and saying things like "Oi, Molly, what about all this shit that already covers what you're talking about" or "You're being too vague, it sounds like you're talking about something else entirely" then the book itself would probably be better.

I think he's a better philosopher than writer, but I'm a n00b to philosophy so what do I know? He could be on 'just touch a stove lmao' level and I'm over-interpreting it.