/lit/ - Literature

>>11267211
The Enchiridion of Epictetus: http://classics.mit.edu/Epictetus/epicench.html

Boom, we stoics now. Follow that with Cicero's De Officiis (On Duties): https://archive.org/details/deofficiiswithen00ciceuoft

A good overview of early Greek philosophy is provided in the Loeb volume Sextus Empiricus' Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Then you can start with Aristotle's Organon to learn to think critically and identify fallacies, and then Plato. Read them both at the same time. If you get bored, move on to some other classic but come back and finish your study. It's good for you.

>>10352312
>just because its unclear how the interaction occurs doesnt mean it does not
I have a bit of a problem with the premise that mind and body are separate at all. They are useful terms but not exclusive.

>>10352304
>so as far as we know a non-physical substance does have agency over our minds
And you say *I'm* the one who is underage. A non-physical substance cannot act on the physical. The phrase itself is an oxymoron.

>>9833497