/lit/ - Literature

>>10647439
>Wow I guess the Babylonians were ignoble when they went around enslaving everyone else. So were the Egyptions. Oh and the ancient Greeks, including most of the philosophers and scientists who personally owned slaves. Oh and the Romans. And basically the entire serf-owning aristrocacy. And all those big powerful wage-slaving owning corporations.
I do not defend these groups, nor do I think that all members were completely noble or ignoble, as you seem to claim I believe; one can be mostly noble, or mostly ignoble, and yet have some traits of the other. I do not believe that the Palestinians, for example, are completely noble, but I can say that the Zionists are ignoble, as Judaism is a wholly materialistic religion devoted to attaining power, and nothing more; the Jews are the minions of the demiurge.

I think I should clarify that I do not assign value or goodness to the condition of being oppressed, but to the quality of one's character; the typical slave is not better than a master, he merely has less power. I judge both by the same standard. I oppose slavery, both being a slavemaster or being a slave, because I abhor suffering and the continuation of the cycles of power struggles. Is it possible for them to end? REI would say yes, if only the noble were to breed and the ignoble prevented, and children educated as to the purpose of their existence.

>What's noble than? All the losers that tried not be enslaved.
Creating culture to unite those with whom you have a mutual affinity (love), and judging those you can unite with according to a standard (fury), thereby optimizing units, is perhaps the primary thing that the noble individual does, though REI describes the concept further, pic related is an important aphorism about it.
The most important thing to take from how REI is describing nobility is that it is primarily about transcendence of struggle and the minimization of suffering, not in the continuation of it; the ideal Zionist world is one where the Gentiles are the slaves to the Jews and cannot escape, the ideal Aryan world is autarkic, without any slaves. Both have transcended the need for struggle, but one has high suffering while the other has none.
>Funny enough with this doctrine the time when the Jews were most noble was when they were trying their hardest to not be assimilated into the culture of their slave-owners...this is also about the time in history when the manuscripts of the old testament went through it's final revisions and the invented of slave morality begins to happen....that's when they were most noble!
I disagree, as I do not assign goodness to the condition of being oppressed, but to nobility. The old testament is merely a Jewish tribalistic manual, and is hence ignoble.