/lit/ - Literature

>>20844004
these jap editions are the littest, without doubt, followed by chinese

>>19231835
Most off the covers are a matter of taste, but the German ones are just awful.

>>19054603
>the OG bloomsbury covers were amazing
lol no
These are objectively a mess, done by 4 different artists and clashing styles. Only Azkaban is really good. The first two are childish, 4th has a weird dragon, and the last three just go for the lazy "thing flying/swishing around" effect.

>>19054749
All of those things exist today just as they did in the past - in expensive fancy editions.

>>12762798
>better than the generic U.K. covers
I suppose so but thats not saying much, some of the covers have been laughably bad.

The line up is as follows:
1) U.K. Children’s
2) Bloomsbury Signature Edition (U.K.)
3) U.K. Adult’s
4) New U.K. Adult edition
5) U.S.
6) New U.S. edition
7) Swedish
8) Dutch
9) French
10) Dutch pocket edition
11) Danish
12) Italian
13) Finnish
14) German
15) Japanese
16) Spanish
17) Chinese
18) French adult
19) M. S. Corley Edition (fan-made)
20) Ukrainian
21) German adult

Any patrician recommendations for patricians like myself who have only read Harry Potter?

>>10228343
Obligatory post, sorry for da bad quality folks

>>8748411
>oh look, a chart of fantasy books, better look for something I haven't heard of
>I wonder what this "Harry Potter" is

>>8592513
pretty good waifus though

>>8592484
>what does /sffg/ think of the Harry Potter series?
Dropped the ball post-Goblet, but it was a great stealth-Christian series anyway.

>>8392494

>>7980884