/lit/ - Literature

>>10161579
>the cold, hard objectivity does exist
Indeed, it's in the text, black on white. It's an object, it's right there.

>our language, or language processes are faulty
Sounds like a reason to stop changing the text, lest we intruduce further faults.

>>10161592
No, it is very, very different.

Which is why there is a business for translating philosophical works, a business for anthologies of select chapters from multiple works of the same author(s), a business for secondary sources on the author(s), a business for guides to and interpretations of particular works, but no business for rewriting canon philosophical texts for retards like you and OP.

Retards that do not see that the text is the goal, not some fucking obstacle.

Is there any fiction that explores deconstrution?

Post-structualism is final philosophy, it perfectly
explains how the world is.
Society and the mind creates all these things we consider as "real".

Jordan Peterson can't get this into his tiny little head.

the wise man bowed his head solemnly and spoke: "theres actually zero difference between good & bad things. you imbecile. you fucking moron"