/lit/ - Literature

>>6935258
>, in the first chapter,
>aphorisms
>he's considered philosopher therefore everything he says is true and has deep philosophical meaning

>>4978635
Cool show until Cartman became the only main character, idk of any equivalent it maight have though...
>>4978650
>>4978672
pic related

>>4910982

>>4649222
>implying anyone thinks black science man is cool
gb2plebbit

>>4626936
Not only does it not matter but in claiming it does, you seem to promote the view that women are only viewed as positive to men for sex which is also a sexist view. So if it's wrong then you're wrong too.
>>4626937
Suasive fatigue? It's calling out a fallacy. Forgive me if I'm not the most eloquent speaker.
>>4626953
Once again, you seem to support the categories that lead to the sexism you denigrate as untrue in the first post.

Now that we've established we're all on the same (sexist) page, I will close with the following remarks: I have a girlfriend of three years and she thinks it's cute when I recite Schopenhauer's and Nietzsche's sexist reflections to them. Sometimes I even mix it up with modern sexism like from Lacan. Personally, I think women actually like sexism because of internalized mysogyny. What is dirty talk after all? So stay jelly. Stay jelly that people like me can get laid without compromising or lieing to themselves about their views.