/lit/ - Literature

>>12605479
>When I read threads like this, all I feel like I'm presented with is is just giant walls of psycho-babble and what is to me just a strange and ill-informed way of coping with modernity.
as the author of many of those giant walls, i can tell you that your initial suspicions are not wrong, and that at least in my own case they are indeed exactly that: strange and ill-informed ways of coping with modernity. that is absolutely what they are. not much more. i have weird hang-ups and questions and fixations and i schizo-ramble about them here, like a yard sale from hell.

>Can someone please explain to me in simple terms just what the fuck is going on here?
cannot into capitalism and modernity. postmodernity isn't working either. schizoanalysis reveals terminal normiecore boring centrism.

>Am I really that much of a brainlet to not understand?
absolutely not. you can read some of these authors too if you like, but don't feel bad if the hysterical rantings of one fucked-up midwit in over his head (me) are difficult to read. this is not Serious Philosophy, that you can find elsewhere.

my advice is to just skip past my posts, they're basically advertisements for loneliness and paranoia. think of them like procedurally generated trash mobs in a haunted carnival. they are there and they have reasons for being there, but they are so many low-level encounters on your way to illumination.

granted, that's mostly about me. some of the other anons here have quite interesting things to say about Whitehead, for instance. but my stuff is complete psychobabble. do not take me seriously or pound your head against any walls.

>What genuine, hopefully vision for the future lies within these posts?
kindness, bewilderment, emptiness, disappearing from this place

>Is there even one?
see above

i recommend you ignore my posts and read the philosophers you like.