/lit/ - Literature

>>19961416

Who are you people?

>>18980085
>leftypol
>the liberal obsession over language hygiene should already tell you as much
are you sure you're talking about leftypol?

>>18980111
>It has happened every single time a marxist has tried to convince factory workers of anything
source: trust me bro
>If you want a super specific example, look up the history of the Portuguese Communist Party immediately after the Carnation Revolution, and how that went down.
stabbed in the back by succdems I see. what else is new
>[the CCP] are not communists, they never have been and they never will be if they intend on staying in power.
they're revisionists if that's what you mean. dengoids gonna deng
>Fascist gangster states have a way of dissipating, see the Mongolian Empire.
*sniff*

this thread went to shit

>>17709084
you have to be over 18 to post on this website

>>16841519
>the total caricature chimes in to confirm everything that has been said

>>16247027
Something that isn't a Marxist analysis isn't simply liberal shilling. It is a history written by a liberal, but the explicit content of the book has nothing to do with liberalism or neoliberalism. Giving the description "(neo)liberal shilling" is not very informative.
We aren't talking about Eichmann in Jerusalem.

Zizek is a cartesian apologist

>>13364260
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxDozuzfVuY

>>13341827
>I don't buy into any ideology
congrats, you just made an ideological statement

>>12562282
>I escaped hyper reality

>>12289891
Thanks for the answer. There is a third one on there that I didn't recognize though. Said should have been obvious, but for some reason that picture didn't remind me of him. Also, am I a pleb for not knowing anything about Hobsbawm?

Also, just realized how horrifying some of those pictures look (especially lower middle). Pic related, in more ways than one.

>>9977802
>thinking you're smarter than most people you've met is automatically bragging
Shut up. There's nothing magical about intelligence. I give people the benefit of the doubt enough as it is, but I'm not going to pretend they'll somehow have satisfactory answers to questions they've had no reason to make themselves in their lives. Or what, do you think I randomly pick people on the street to ask them philosophical and literary questions?

>>9345545
Seriously: the saddest of them all, to the level of fuckep upness: Minima Moralia. Anon, there's no right living in the wrong one.

Go fucking away shill.

There's a post about this nigger on every fucking collection of posts. Right now there is a post about this "basic economics" falling away and disappearing. And you, knowingly, made another.

Go away, stop.

>>9130554
>taking anything Zizek says at face value

wew

>>9113794
>mf when Rothbard said: "not merely the greatest novel ever written, [but] one of the very greatest books ever written, fiction or nonfiction." HA-HA-HA

>>9029722

>filename not "shareadesire.jpg"

>>8983991
ohhh, the naiveité

>>8723394
>basic human psychological drives

>>8591449
>Read technical books, avoid ideological books
>Read technical books, avoid ideological books
>Read technical books, avoid ideological books
>Read technical books, avoid ideological books

>>8494420
>so abolish private property then?
>How about suck my dick?

>Because if we abolish private property, it's going to be essentially people like you and I enslaved generating welath so that Africans (read: subhuman retards) can fuck around and eat fried chicken for free.

Shit, didn't realize I was talking to /pol/. You could try making an actual argument before descending into your autistic fit against those mean black kids who laughed at you in school.

>tfw too in mature in my teen years and didnt care about math
>tfw permisive post-modern parents didnt give a fuck
>tfw I realize now that math literally the most beautiful thing but i cant into it
>tfw cant into STEMhood
>tfw you fell for the humanities meme
>tfw you fell for the art meme
>>8371081
this interests me