/lit/ - Literature

>>12198857

I think both of us are in agreement on that point. To divorce the two is a mistake.

The problem with the Western tradition and classical apologetics is the forming of an axiom without reference to God prior to positing His existence. To make God less certain than the law of noncontradiction calls into question the veracity of His existence. A transcendental proof would simply refer the totality of the structure (something similar but not equivalent to Plato's forms) of the universe to His Logos, which would qualify as the precondition of all existence.

>>11943860

to live virtuously is to be despised

every ideology is a manufactured product of the establishment. controlled dialectics

the vast majority of "chatter" in one's head is demonic

the ideal of "progress" is a lie