/lit/ - Literature

>>22096478
>How can people take it seriously
Lol you got me OP haha. Now how about you tell us your worldview, and why we should take it more seriously than jewbook?

>>21722415
>because they are so terrified of the implications of that not being true
Doesn't bother me one bit. Omnibenevolence was the dumbest of the three omnis. The fact is that God is beyond good and evil. For all his atheist larping, Nietzsche was constantly going back to the Bible and the works of Luther for inspiration. This only stopped in his later career, when he rejected it entirely (Antichrist) and became a fatefag (Ecce Homo), though that could be blamed on his declining mental health. Ironically, he somewhat returned to his original self the madder he got.

>>21406205
>Nietzsche himself, who
overwhelmed minds with his “beyond good and evil” (which denied the fruits of the tree of knowledge though people did not realise it, any more than Nietzsche did), his morality of masters, his will to power (Deus omnipotens, ex nihilo creans omnia), ended by glorifying the “love of fate.”
>The supreme wisdom consists in loving the inevitable.
>He forgot that it was precisely this that Socrates, whom he recognised as the fallen man par excellence, had taught.
Fatefags are worse than christcucks.

>>21404831
All refuted by picrel.

>>21396212
Wrong photo op.

>Nietzsche himself, who overwhelmed minds with his "beyond good and evil" (which denied the fruits of the tree of knowledge though people did not realise it, any more than Nietzsche did), his morality of masters, his will to power (Deus omnipotens, ex nihilo creans omnia), ended by glorifying the "love of fate."
>The supreme wisdom consists in loving the inevitable.
>He forgot that it was precisely this that Socrates, whom he recognised as the fallen man par excellence, had taught.
Name a christcuck (christchad in this case) critique of Nietzsche more devastating than the above.
Hint: you can't

>>21391189
More accurate than faggot op

>rejected decadent slave morality of Socrates
>became a cucked fatefag like Socrates
kek

>>21378110
Read Shestov and Wittgenstein, get filtered by them, and then kys. philosophy is a crime against God, nature, and humanity

>Luther felt that man would recover freedom only when reason and the knowledge that reason gives us will have lost their power. And Nietzsche, as we have seen, felt this also. He refused to accept the testimony of fact and tried to break the self-evidences with the hammer of his will. But when Zarathustra came down from his heights to men, he was obliged to come to terms with his terrible enemy. We read in Ecce homo, Nietzsche’s last work, “My formula for the greatness of man is amor fati – to change nothing, neither before nor after, throughout all eternity. Not only to bear Necessity, and still less to hide it – all idealism is a lie in the face of Necessity – but to love it.” But such was precisely the teaching of the decadent, the fallen man, Socrates! Such were the fruits of the tree of knowledge which, according to Hegel, were to be the principle of philosophy for all time. It was this also that Spinoza, who assimilated Socrates’ wisdom and saw happiness in virtue, proclaimed.
>Instead of engaging in supreme combat with Necessity, Nietzsche, velut paralyticus, manibus et pedibus omissis (like a cripple, with slack arms and legs), abandons himself to his adversary and hands over his soul to it; he promises not only to obey and venerate but to love it. And he does not make this promise only in his own name; all must submit to Necessity, venerate and love it, or else they will be excommunicated. Excommunicated by whom? Amor fati, says Nietzsche, is the formula for greatness, and he who refuses to accept everything that fatum imposes upon him will be deprived of the praise, the encouragement, the approbation that the idea of “greatness” contains in itself. The old “you will be like G-d” arose anew, one knows not whence, and cast a spell upon Nietzsche who, before our very eyes, had made such heroic efforts to pass beyond good and evil, that is, beyond all praises, encouragements and approbations.
>How could this happen? Must we believe in the intervention of the biblical serpent who had once seduced Adam? Indeed, translated into the language of Luther, amor fati means that Nietzsche sees “the monster without whose killing man cannot live” not in the chains which bind the human will but in the human will itself, in its drive to power. Accordingly, he strains all of his forces not to destroy or at least weaken his enemy but to kill in himself every desire for battle, to learn to see his essential task in uncomplaining, joyous even, and loving submission to all that comes to him from outside without his knowing whence or how. And this is the same Nietzsche who spoke so much of the morality of masters and railed so scornfully against the morality of slaves, who refused to stoop or bow down before any authority whatsoever! But when he looked Necessity in the face, his powers betrayed him and he built for it an altar of which the most exacting of the inhabitants of Olympus could have been jealous.
Nietzschebros.....

>I only first learned of Hasidim through Buber. I heard some about them from my father, who was knowledgeable in Hebrew things, but he was indifferent to religion. He gave me the idea that among "dirty Jews" these ones were still dirtier.
>Do congratulate me, Shestov says, I am not going to Palestine. The Jews could not manage a 4000 francs deposit requested by England. If it was for a Christian, a Merezhkovsky or a Bunin, they would have done the impossible. I never had any luck with the Jews. I complain about it so often that my brother-in-law is beginning to worry that I have become an antisemite.
Is he /ourheeb/?

Hey guys should I read lev shestov and where should I start with him