/lit/ - Literature

>>7135872
>But that doesn't mean we can corral them in a daycare.
Then close the borders.
If they aren't helpless, why are we even taking them on?
You do realise they go to Europe of their own volition,
not Iran or the middle East because, I would presume, the living conditions are better,
or those countries don't let them in.
Europe can not increase its population just because of a sad news story,
its economically implausible.

>>7132740
>beauty, like kindness, is an act of will and not some external thing
Kindness is beautiful.
Beauty is not an act of will, kindness is an act of will.

I do not conflate them,
one is a category and one is an "act of kindness".

>>7127798
Reported.

>>7093344
>And I'd love to know where you get point five. Do we just go with our gut feelings on historical figures once we've established an opinion on them? That's lazy and a very poor methodology.
That is not what I am saying.
1. I provided a source, it simply was not satisfactory per the prerequisites which I still don't understand, nor I think are understandable, considering there is no reason to think they will ever be attainable.
2. The point was this is the only thing that one can do if sources can not claim any thing since there are none that are sufficient (per the counterargument).
3. I am saying with out the source, my PERSONAL OPINION, would remain the same, with or with out it, until some one provided some other source, which, per the counterargument, is never sufficient. My opinion is based on the source I provided, namely an historical book by Johnathan Fenby. If I read another source and change my mind, then I will, but that has not been made available to me.